Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:27:55 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_poll.c Message-ID: <20050906012755.B34182@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050906061828.GQ41863@cell.sick.ru>; from glebius@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:18:28AM %2B0400 References: <200509051602.j85G2Bpo090258@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050905094341.A23343@xorpc.icir.org> <20050905180050.GB41863@cell.sick.ru> <20050905141451.A27290@xorpc.icir.org> <20050906061828.GQ41863@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:18:28AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Luigi, ... > The idlepoll thread is single. ok this is very good. Re. netisr vs idlepoll, perhaps a way could be to bump the idlepoll priority very high upon a net soft interrupt, and drop it down to its normal value once done with the netisr cycle. so we don't have to arbitrate among the two. cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050906012755.B34182>