From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 20 12:34:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670E7BC087F for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com (mail-ua0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2209B1D70 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 74so121562893uau.0 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 05:34:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RMUwwiLfWPVNFH6Qq0tYQJH6SeOOvPTlggpMMoAQUjU=; b=DMRvPCZiqzaI4wY61xwCN21euBevDMmhv+Em7zGp0yQNgYnbIXi6Heu7FyPhIzqk6Q QzDkGx3U2yZ35ElKoiOMvBJp8qH7yDci43brCVZWvpn0RsxNRD9mbN6iE5e7w0rnwkld sVNz9bnDHC7L8+KJJoGfbmAqxqpEeLbiPE4HJuiPV3U65rQf73fZoODlQKXifffEH5c9 4L72db/LtHkGvOl/3zHze+LzYaXEa1ax5KNnQymoo6+VSFdscrU5DLneSN8o607YBJK+ 9G+TZCYwtLxSEKJPmjRJ0QB+rUJE9hBI3y0E/bEpeGkNc/Xx0ygh7VWqvaQA6UgrNVcM 5gbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RMUwwiLfWPVNFH6Qq0tYQJH6SeOOvPTlggpMMoAQUjU=; b=Zln9PKtAkON1wa7FeEICd+0qeZQTaGB5cVkMAnkmaL0lxUkJ270YB5sQTblpxYAugz tUa4mi67IBxwiZMcu7b5cfWxT3IQeLkF/QtVSNj7SAL9lbuiqs+sTLPbWD1o2vFT7pgh MD/wsKHjWC7oESTM1Z/MLQOui4MJCU+g3PNZid3y6VRLUzqOTIRvklWvIKpTWY49/ajO UaqWyhD1bT6YVFjKG600xG7vkFkFrZCN9KE0ZoHwG2lD5rF5kgzLFjueRJEtlo86zQe7 /KLWzX3rUJI/9fJ0Wqt2AR2wHXsuEA5q11PrhhN5OKz5GR1EhaK4eQruikRupTVOlrR6 lFMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvuQ0r4Cvge6ASE3ienP7QvZKVjoL8fURKKZhUofqAvI9faoZH4cI8YpPaZ8Nv8mEAVww/z15jc9SLo3Q== X-Received: by 10.31.107.89 with SMTP id g86mr5594033vkc.52.1471696455292; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 05:34:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.75.79 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 05:34:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Demelier Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:34:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Safe to buildworld/buildkernel 10.1 -> 10.3 (skip 10.2) To: Chris Stankevitz Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:34:16 -0000 2016-08-17 19:17 GMT+02:00 Chris Stankevitz : > Hi, > > Is it safe to upgrade directly from 10.1 to 10.3? My systems are not > connected to the internet. I upgrade by sneaker-netting /usr/src and > building world/kernel. > AFAIK, there is nothing wrong in upgrading in more that one step. The /usr/src/UPDATING tells if there are something to do before updating, it's pretty rare but sometimes it's needed. I remember a version required to build the config(8) tool before anything else. HTH, -- Demelier David