From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 12 06:44:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3130D16A412;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7643CA4;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2611747B;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:54:19 +1100."
	<20061212160016.W56465@delplex.bde.org> 
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:44:03 +0000
Message-ID: <32874.1165905843@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: "Arne H. Juul" <arnej@pvv.ntnu.no>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>,
	David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org,
	Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: close() of active socket does not work on FreeBSD 6 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:44:11 -0000

In message <20061212160016.W56465@delplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Daniel Eischen wrote:

>It's probably a nightmare in the kernel too.  close() starts looking
>like revoke(), and revoke() has large problems and bugs in this area.

There is the distinctive difference that revoke() operates on a name
and close() on a filedescriptor, but otherwise I agree.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.