From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 26 00:24:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA24860 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:24:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA24855 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02827; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:24:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199801260824.AAA02827@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: brian@worldcontrol.com cc: Randy Terbush , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cyclades/Hylafax/SMP select problems? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:13:31 PST." <19980126001331.05717@top.worldcontrol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:24:27 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Any clues as to where is spending its time?? Cheers, Amancio > On %M %N, Randy Terbush wrote: > > I have a dual P6 machine with a Cy-16Ye running the latest > > current. > > > > The Hylafax faxgetty and faxq processes spin out of control > > chewing up nearly 100% CPU. The same configuration ran without > > problems on a single P5 machine running 2.2-STABLE. > > > > As I begin to dig deeper into this, are there any know problems > > with this mix? > > Just thought you'd like to know you are not alone. faxq on > my SMP system does the same thing. > > -- > Brian Litzinger