From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Mar 28 5:30:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA57637B41A; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g2SDUQW47350; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:30:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.1.10]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g2SDKk6e020191; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:20:46 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2SDKjnU024809; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:20:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2SDKgBA024808; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:20:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:20:42 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Julian Elischer Cc: Jake Burkholder , John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP safe reference counting Message-ID: <20020328132041.GA24734@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <20020327171351.E31836@locore.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:34:59PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > Apparently, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:51:57PM -0500, > > > > We support 386 still? > > > We certainly support it but I think that for 386 we can ignore the concept > of SMP and make versions that are not SMP safe but DO > satisfy the basic functionality.. > > i.e. the '386 version of atomic ops need not be atomic :-) They need to be atomic in the sense of preemtion. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message