From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jan 21 13:32:27 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFCA37B402
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 13:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0LLW4901889;
	Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:32:04 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200101212132.f0LLW4901889@harmony.village.org>
To: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" <tirloni@techie.com>
Subject: Re: Securelevel idea 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:29 -0200."
		<Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk>  
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:32:04 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk> "Giovanni P. Tirloni" writes:
:  I was thinking about securelevels this afternoon and my brain came up
:  with an idea: what about if we could set fine-grained securelevels? Like,
:  each securelevel could have its own set of prohibitons and that could
:  only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
:  one.

Better to do this with sysctls.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message