From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 3 05:33:08 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA05395 for current-outgoing; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 05:33:08 -0700 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA05389 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 05:33:05 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Mon, 3 Apr 1995 07:32:45 -0500 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 07:32:44 -0500 To: current@freefall.cdrom.com From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: Thinking about CTM and the installation.. Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >Ok, here's the scenario: > >Developer installs latest 2.1R using the CDROM [snip] >Select Using CTM->Register With CTM. Now what? >They get the *entire* source tree again via mail so that they can be >sync'd up? >That'd suck! At least sup, again, would merely update the timestamps >after seeing that the files were the same. Is it possible to do >something similar with CTM? 1) Signing up with CTM should set up the CTM tree structure and register you for FUTURE mailings. 2) The CDROM should have the appropriate flags to indicate the CTM level of that set of sources. 3) The missing part is the set of CTM updates that occurred between the time the CD was mastered and the present time. Do we need an automated ftp-by-mail to have those updates also sent? ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net