Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:34:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219684] ports-mgmt/portlint: change the CONFLICTS warnings Message-ID: <bug-219684-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219684 Bug ID: 219684 Summary: ports-mgmt/portlint: change the CONFLICTS warnings Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: marcus@FreeBSD.org Reporter: mat@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(marcus@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: marcus@FreeBSD.org Before pkg came along, different packages could have the same name, and it = was ok, so we were forced to have CONFLICTS line looking like this: CONFLICTS=3D bind9*-9.[45678].* bind9*-sdb-9.[45678].* bind910-* bind91= 1-* bind-tools-9.* Now, all packages name must be different, so if one port conflicts with another, all it needs to say is: CONFLICTS=3D bind-tools bind9-devel bind910 bind911 But with this perfectly fine line, portlint says: WARN: Conflict "bind-tools" specified too narrow. You should end it with a wildcard (-[0-9]*). WARN: Conflict "bind9-devel" specified too narrow. You should end it with a wildcard (-[0-9]*). WARN: Conflict "bind910" specified too narrow. You should end it with a wildcard (-[0-9]*). WARN: Conflict "bind911" specified too narrow. You should end it with a wildcard (-[0-9]*). Which is wrong, whilst adding -[0-9]* would work and do the same thing, it = is unneeded, and it makes the conflicts lines so much harder to read. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219684-13>