From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 08:42:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBDA106566B for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igor@soumenkov.com) Received: from www.error-bank.com (2017.x.rootbsd.net [208.86.225.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5A48FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soumenkov.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.error-bank.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7C961C40; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:25:16 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:25:15 +0400 From: igor To: In-Reply-To: References: <201108221124.p7MBO4p1018433@freefall.freebsd.org> <201108221318.02398.makc@freebsd.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: igor@soumenkov.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.5.3 Cc: Max Brazhnikov Subject: How to escalate? ports/159276 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:42:23 -0000 Dear all, How can I escalate the issue related to one of the ports? It seems that the comitter who introduced the problem with a patch (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/cmake/files/patch-Modules_Compiler_GNU.cmake?rev=1.1) to the port does not want to do anything with it. There is a PR open (159276). Cmake is widely used in the company I am working for, and now as a FreeBSD user I get cmake that is different from everyone else's, because my default Debug and Release build have empty CFLAGS. Now I have to manually fix these flags back each time I reconfigure my build directories. On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:38:44 +0400, igor wrote: >> It a usual practice to close duplicated reports. The patch in >> question was >> added for some reasons and we can't just remove it, until we find >> better >> solution. > > The patch altered the way original cmake behaves. It all worked very > well until someone added this patch. It works well in Debian, for > example. > This makes it very inconvenient to use cmake from ports for software > development. -- Igor Soumenkov