From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 25 19:32:07 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D170CE2
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net)
Received: from portland1.byshenk.net (portland1.byshenk.net [69.168.54.16])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1B32E3
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from portland1.byshenk.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by portland1.byshenk.net (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0PJTQMU086234;
 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:29:26 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from byshenknet@portland1.byshenk.net)
Received: (from byshenknet@localhost)
 by portland1.byshenk.net (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0PJTPvA086233;
 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:29:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from byshenknet)
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:29:25 -0800
From: Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn - but smaller?
Message-ID: <20130125192925.GB2020@portland1.byshenk.net>
References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET>
 <87mww00w89.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net>
 <20130123153724.GA79995@e-Gitt.NET> <510007F4.20701@sentex.net>
 <1358960762-2331017.37282719.fr0NH5PFb026896@rs149.luxsci.com>
 <CAGE5yCpGWiGpeJSJzJGq0SB74nJ-b+FEWgAM7b+XqK5u8HpEog@mail.gmail.com>
 <510284A3.8030509@digsys.bg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <510284A3.8030509@digsys.bg>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
 portland1.byshenk.net
Cc: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:32:07 -0000

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
[...]
> It is absurd to require the installation of any port, if your only 
> intention is to update the base system sources.

I think others have already pointed this out, but
"if your only intention is to update the base system
sources", then 'freebsd-update' (from the base system)
will do the job.

Or am I missing/misunderstanding something?

 
-- 
greg byshenk  -  gbyshenk@byshenk.net  -  Leiden, NL - Portland, OR USA