From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org  Sun Sep 22 10:50:54 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99432FD78F;
 Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46bkl23d0mz4f8k;
 Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354)
 id 74E8F2EE1; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
To: Vasily Postnicov <shamaz.mazum@gmail.com>
Cc: starikarp@dismail.de, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD X11 <x11@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: llvm90 -why
References: <20190922051624.4a628733@dismail.de> <h854-iqaq-wny@FreeBSD.org>
 <20190922102528.63ab9df0@dismail.de>
 <CADnZ6BnuX=sE_53-9bVLqga4XEznj8mYUf5QDBVsx=XCciRV+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:50:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CADnZ6BnuX=sE_53-9bVLqga4XEznj8mYUf5QDBVsx=XCciRV+A@mail.gmail.com>
 (Vasily Postnicov's message of "Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:32:53 +0300")
Message-ID: <zhiw-haes-wny@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-x11>,
 <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
 <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:54 -0000

Vasily Postnicov <shamaz.mazum@gmail.com> writes:

> =D0=B2=D1=81, 22 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82. 2019 =D0=B3., 13:25 ajtiM via =
freebsd-x11 <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:22:21 +0200
>> Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> > ajtiM via freebsd-x11 <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> writes:
>> >
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > Mesa-dri is updated and needs llvm90. It is okay. But libosmesa
>> > > needs llvm80. Now I have llvm60, llvm80 and llvm90 and and each one
>> > > needs a lot of time to build.
>> > >
>> > > pkg info -r llvm80
>> > > llvm80-8.0.1.:
>> > > libosmesa
>> >
>> > I didn't notice, and poudriere doesn't catch such issues.
>> > Fixed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/512572
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> What's worse, lang/clover was not updated and still seems to require
> llvm80, but devel/libclc now depends on llvm90. This breaks OpenCL on amd
> cards completely

lang/clover doesn't build with llvm90, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/P294
I'm relying on users' feedback as the maintainer didn't help test bug 23968=
2.

Can you document OpenCL error for posterity?