From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  5 19:56:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D492216A4CE; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 19:56:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from postino-2.etat.lu (postino-2.etat.lu [194.154.205.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 17C3D43D58; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 19:56:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu)
Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6])
	by postino-2.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EE6AF11141AA; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6])
	by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP
	id 0350F214F9; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 21:56:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56])
	by dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP
	id E61A02103C; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56])
 by store.etat.lu
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
 with ESMTP id <0IEH00HAVOQUT790@store.etat.lu>; Tue,
 05 Apr 2005 21:56:55 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from etat.lu ([148.110.136.56])
 by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct
 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IEH005N7OQUB170@store.etat.lu>; Tue,
 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.43] (Forwarded-For: [158.64.124.154])
 by store.etat.lu (mshttpd); Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:56:54 +0200
From: Didier Wiroth <didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu>
To: Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>
Message-id: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21
 2004)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: fr
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
X-Accept-Language: fr
Priority: normal
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: delphij@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for
	FreeBSD-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:56:57 -0000

Hello,
Thank you very much for replying.

> cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol
> patch </path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215

I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today.
The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors.

|Index: vidcontrol.c

|===================================================================

|RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol/vidcontrol.c,v

|retrieving revision 1.48

|diff -u -r1.48 vidcontrol.c

|--- vidcontrol.c	13 Jan 2005 03:59:44 -0000	1.48

|+++ vidcontrol.c	17 Jan 2005 05:27:25 -0000

--------------------------

Patching file vidcontrol.c using Plan A...

Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.

Hunk #2 succeeded at 48.

Hunk #3 succeeded at 66 with fuzz 1.

Hunk #4 failed at 187.

Hunk #5 succeeded at 223.

Hunk #6 failed at 239.

Hunk #7 failed at 257.

Hunk #8 failed at 297.

Hunk #9 failed at 332.

Hunk #10 succeeded at 348 with fuzz 2.

Hunk #11 failed at 377.

Hunk #12 failed at 419.

Hunk #13 failed at 507.

Hunk #14 failed at 572.

Hunk #15 failed at 669.

Hunk #16 failed at 722.

Hunk #17 failed at 743.

Hunk #18 failed at 806.

Hunk #19 succeeded at 891.

Hunk #20 failed at 900.

Hunk #21 failed at 933.

Hunk #22 succeeded at 950 with fuzz 2.

Hunk #23 failed at 962.

Hunk #24 failed at 985.

Hunk #25 failed at 1035.

Hunk #26 failed at 1050.

Hunk #27 succeeded at 1148.

Hunk #28 succeeded at 1173.

Hunk #29 succeeded at 1217.

Hunk #30 succeeded at 1234.

19 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to vidcontrol.c.rej

done