Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 14:22:37 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.local vs. /usr/local/etc/rc.d vs. ??? Message-ID: <19980414142237.55131@ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980414124555.7875C-100000@zerium.newmedia.no>; from Hans Petter Bieker on Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 12:54:55PM %2B0200 References: <19980414121628.09869@ucb.crimea.ua> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980414124555.7875C-100000@zerium.newmedia.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Hans Petter Bieker wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > There is no such directory - /etc/rc.d ;-) > > There is no such directory - /usr/local/etc/rc.d/${hostname} > > btw1 -- /bin/mkdir is a nice tool. > btw2 -- hostname is set after local_startup in the default rc.conf -- > you'll have to reorganise/hardcode it to make it work. I don't suggest to use /bin/hostname. I suggest to use ${hostname}, defined in /etc/rc.conf. The line . /etc/rc.conf appears before for dir in ${local_startup}; do in /etc/rc. I don't want to follow this thread anymore ;-( It's just wasting a time. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980414142237.55131>