From owner-freebsd-commit Sun Sep 17 00:21:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-commit Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA01537 for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:21:34 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA01525 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:21:32 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA01515 for cvs-user-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:21:30 -0700 Received: from aslan.cdrom.com (aslan.cdrom.com [192.216.223.142]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA01508 ; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:21:25 -0700 Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA07937; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:20:50 -0700 Message-Id: <199509170720.AAA07937@aslan.cdrom.com> X-Authentication-Warning: aslan.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Mark Murray cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/eBones/usr.sbin/kerberos kerberos.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 09:11:14 +0200." <199509170711.JAA16606@grumble.grondar.za> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:20:50 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >So for my repository, if I make RELENG_2_1_0 the same as HEAD _now_, >I shouldn't break anything for eBones and secure? You will lose CVS revision state if you do, but the code should be identical. In other words, if you deleted the RELENG_2_1_0 tag off of everything and retaged it all with RELENG_2_1_0, you'd be fine, but you wouldn't have any record of the deltas that were done since this same tag operation was performed on freefall. >> >Is the same happening for secure? >> >> So far, yes. I don't know of anything else planned for secure in the near >> future though. > >]:-> I will be bringing in the new DES library (hopefully today), and in >the next few days I want to repair Secure RPC. Is the DES portion of the library basically identical to the old one? I want to ensure that 2.1 can be a full fledged krbIV server and client, so I'm a little leary of bringing this type of stuff into 2.1 so late in the game. The source re-org of eBones was easy to shake the bugs out of since the code didn't change. A library may not be so easy and testing time is limited. > >M >-- >Mark Murray >46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa >+27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 >Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== Software Developer - Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================