From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 22:27:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EE6106564A; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF48FC14; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7NMRH6t071725; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:27:17 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7NMRH6u071724; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:27:17 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:27:13 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Steve Wills Message-ID: <20120823222712.GH18372@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <97612B57-1255-4BB3-A6D3-FC74324C6D67@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqCDj3hiknadvR6t" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97612B57-1255-4BB3-A6D3-FC74324C6D67@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:27:18 -0000 --AqCDj3hiknadvR6t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:19:57PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, >=20 > It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin= /pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is confusing th= at running the command gets different results the second time it is run vs.= the first time. I can imagine a user saying "I ran pkg, but it didn't do w= hat they said it would. Now I run it again, and it does do what it is supp= osed to." Also, it would enable setting up a pkg-bootstrap man page separat= e from the pkg man page, without confusion about which one you're looking a= t. >=20 > So, opinions? There may still be time to fix it for 9.1 if we can decide = quickly. >=20 I do personnally have no opinion on this, I have hesitated long between both before choosing /usr/sbin/pkg. I'm interested in other's opinion. regards, Bapt --AqCDj3hiknadvR6t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlA2rkAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex7wACdEqj6Voz/cLCwB0Wz14EgrAVE SjkAmwVKxjbKoMOA/fheXbJGPAYHiAAM =OmCe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqCDj3hiknadvR6t--