Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:22:48 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/ghostscript9 Makefile ports/print/ghostscript9/files patch-base-gdevl256.c patch-base-gdevvglb.c Message-ID: <4E22E228.3020303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107171118.p6HBIlc6096985@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201107171118.p6HBIlc6096985@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 17.07.2011 13:18, schrieb Hiroki Sato: > hrs 2011-07-17 11:18:47 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > print/ghostscript9 Makefile > Added files: > print/ghostscript9/files patch-base-gdevl256.c > patch-base-gdevvglb.c > Log: > Fix a build failure when vaglib and/or lvga256 is specified. It is very unfortunate that the PORTREVISION was bumped, and wasteful. This was not necessary, let me explain: - if the build fails given specific (apparently non-default) options, there is no prior port/package where files change - we bump PORTREVISION only if installed files or dependencies change. Since no files changed (no prior files got built/installed), no need to bump PORTREVISION. Thanks for not arbitrarily bumping PORTREVISION.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E22E228.3020303>