From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Dec 24  2:30: 3 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383F614D47
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 02:30:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: from current1.whiste.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22])
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA63978;
	Fri, 24 Dec 1999 02:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 02:29:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Vmware and -current 
In-Reply-To: <29046.946027616@critter.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912240229000.61026-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> It is not out of the question to bring buffered disk access back,
> but it will be an ioctl enabled function for disks, not a vnode
> mode.  Peter has suggested doing it with a layered device a'la vn(4).

Actually that was me.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message