From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 31 12:27:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C6514CAC for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 12:27:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from home.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [207.76.204.203]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA23807; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 12:27:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 12:27:44 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer X-Sender: julian@home.elischer.org To: Amancio Hasty Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Discussions starting on -arch. In-Reply-To: <199910312022.MAA07438@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG yes it is a possibility.. see terry's thread model (coming up soon). (at least lurk) On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > I am not that really interested on threads.. > > > Is there a possibility of having an async call gate for which the kernel > can do the scheduling whether be for a uni processor or a multi processor > enviroment. > > > -- > > Amancio Hasty > hasty@rah.star-gate.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message