From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Dec 10 15:46:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA04612
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:46:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from gateway2.platinum.com (gateway2.platinum.com [206.214.170.8])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA04597
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:45:57 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from nordquist@platinum.com)
Received: by gateway2.platinum.com; id RAA29935; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 17:45:54 -0600
Received: from mailhub.platinum.com(172.17.26.25) by gateway2.platinum.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma029898; Wed, 10 Dec 97 17:45:37 -0600
Received: from bigbert.vt.platinum.com (bigbert.vt.platinum.com [192.168.105.250]) by mailhub.platinum.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22228; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 17:45:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from neq1bert.vt.platinum.com by bigbert.vt.platinum.com (8.8.5/NX3.0S)
	id RAA09251; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 17:45:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: by neq1bert.vt.platinum.com with Microsoft Mail
	id <01BD0593.66C4D930@neq1bert.vt.platinum.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 17:45:27 -0600
Message-ID: <01BD0593.66C4D930@neq1bert.vt.platinum.com>
From: "Brent J. Nordquist" <nordquist@platinum.com>
To: "'Tom'" <tom@uniserve.com>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: Header not found building F00F patch under 2.2.5
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 17:45:26 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes, that was a typo on my part.  (I did send the question to -stable.)

Thanks for the hint... I guess I'll have to get -stable to use this.

Brent

-----Original Message-----
From:	Tom [SMTP:tom@uniserve.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, December 10, 1997 5:35 PM
To:	Brent J. Nordquist
Cc:	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:	Re: Header not found building F00F patch under 2.2.5


On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Brent J. Nordquist wrote:

> I subscribe to the -current mailing list, but I haven't seen this one
> go by.

  Because it belongs on -stable

> Any suggestions on what I should try next?

  Check out RELENG_2_2.

  The patch seems to have been made versus 2.2.5-stable, so:

  2.2.5-stable = 2.2.5-RELEASE + patches + F0 patch

  You can get 2.2.5-stable by just using the RELENG_2_2 branch.

Tom