Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:56:53 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>, Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4 Message-ID: <4D4C5A05.2000909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110204093807.GA2803@straylight.ringlet.net> References: <4D4B0CDB.9000404@nagafix.co.uk> <4D4B400A.2090701@FreeBSD.org> <4D4BA777.2030701@nagafix.co.uk> <20110204084939.GF34314@home.opsec.eu> <20110204093807.GA2803@straylight.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm confused. Why are we not using the sources from the "regular" location, and patching to make them work for us? And has anyone contacted the upstream about the changes and why they are necessary? This whole thing seems very confusing to me (but that's not saying much). :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D4C5A05.2000909>