From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Mar 26 17:29:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA20201
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cisco.it ([194.183.8.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20188
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pentium-120 (ppp-03.cisco.it [194.183.8.32]) by cisco.it (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA17796 for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 02:30:11 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 02:30:11 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199703270130.CAA17796@cisco.it>
X-Sender: cp011@posta.cisco.it
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Antonio Nati <A.Nati@cisco.it>
Subject: Re: ifconfig and area 10.x.x.x
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


The problem has disappeared when the lo0 (internal loop-back) configuration
line is executed before the ed0 (ethernet address) line.

Any explanation?