From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Jul 8 13:32:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from fed-ef1.frb.gov (fed.frb.gov [132.200.32.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A30C14FF9 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org) Received: by fed-ef1.frb.gov; id QAA21158; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1pmdf.frb.gov(192.168.3.38) by fed.frb.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma020958; Thu, 8 Jul 99 16:31:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 16:31:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache In-reply-to: <378506C7.BB772E44@thuntek.net> To: Donald Wilde Cc: Bill Fumerola , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hold up a sec. FreeBSD did NOT perform as well. Check the stats again. The only things FreeBSD beat the other OS in was serving STATIC pages (and mod_perl handler stuff). The "crucial" tests (dynamic content via cgi's) showed the other OS to edge out our beloved FreeBSD. SB On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Donald Wilde wrote: > I wasn't concerned with his methodology, Bill, although I noticed the > three points you make in a cursory glance. I would suspect it's #1 > that's the reason FBSD works better. My only reason for the cross-post > is that FreeBSD came out better. If we recall the vanished gartner group > report, they came out with a more than 15% improvement for FreeBSD. > > -- > Donald Wilde "Bringing the Internet to everyone!" > Wilde Media > PMB 117, 1380 Rio Rancho Blvd SE v: 505-771-0709 f: 771-1356 > Rio Rancho, New Mexico 87124 web: http://www.Wilde-Media.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message