From owner-cvs-ports Mon Apr 17 17:20:29 1995 Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA04785 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 17:20:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA04769 ; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 17:20:24 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina), asami@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cern_linemode - Imported sources In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Apr 95 10:28:43 PDT." <199504171728.KAA28813@ref.tfs.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 17:20:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4767.798164423@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Either that or indicative of the fact that the porter simply has too much time on their hands. Truly, by that yardstick you could justify *anything*! I think Paul's right - some degree of quality control must be instituted before we wind up with potentially hundreds of mutant and broken ports which make the entire collection smell like a leper colony on a hot day. In any case, this isn't our call. It's Satoshi's. He's the portsmeister and the guy who ends up CLEANING UP the messes the rest of the porters leave behind, so if he says "no" to something then it means "NO". Jordan > > Actually, your statement is in conflict with what the guidelines (used to?) > > say. > > The fact that somebody wants to port it is significant statement of utility > to me. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. > 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' > => 'no rude people are relevant'