From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 1 11:59:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB81E32 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65A7D0B for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:59:49 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=N7UQSQNB c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=nVny9ETX7T5uMhI2oTVyRA==:117 a=Qm7PpDN649EA:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=sIt-5M63AAAA:8 a=_dmXLmcpbGkA:10 a=g7DU_W_b8aicMegLqGEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.193.164 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.193.164] ([209.6.193.164:60142] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id 22/97-02280-E22E9A15; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 07:59:43 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20905.57901.934369.586878@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:59:41 -0400 To: s m Subject: Re: define more partitions in freebsd In-Reply-To: References: <20130601092111.8c1ad1c0.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:59:49 -0000 s m writes: > and my last question, some people say to change byte 0x28a of the > disk from 0x08 to 0x14 (which 14 is the number of partitions). do > you think it's a good idea and applicable solution? Short answer: if you have to ask - no, it isn't. :-) Respectfully, Robert Huff