From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 28 12:15:41 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA06363 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:15:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA06350; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:15:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 105xpw-0001x8-00; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:14:48 -0800 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:14:46 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis cc: Julian Elischer , asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates on / In-Reply-To: <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > #define quoting(Julian Elischer) > // On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > // > Is there a strong reason for softupdates be a tunefs option, instead of > // > a mount option ? This could be easily solved by a > // > // kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man" > ^^^^^^^^^ > > I got your point, but can you list these arguments ? If it's only "he > wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's > a technical reason, I'd like to know. > > Thanks in advance, The arguements are in the archives. And yes they do make very good sense. > Jonny > > -- > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student > jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro > "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message