Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:29 +0100 From: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com> To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD Message-ID: <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> In-Reply-To: <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >> functionality? > > The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the > latter. Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. It is uneasy to parse too. greetings, Philipp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49418BD9.8080105>