From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 15 18:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509816A4E1 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (megan.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B71F43D95 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 27761 invoked by uid 2001); 15 Aug 2006 18:51:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:51:14 -0500 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: ANdrei Message-ID: <20060815185114.GA27691@megan.kiwi-computer.com> References: <16653.137.154.16.31.1155617267.squirrel@webmail.bong.com.au> <04fb01c6c052$6ad7d9e0$857ba8c0@Rage> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04fb01c6c052$6ad7d9e0$857ba8c0@Rage> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building an old-hardware server X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:51:25 -0000 On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:03:15PM +0300, ANdrei wrote: > > >1 gig hard disks are a waste of time, space and money. > > How about 2gig ones? ;) > I actually don't pay anything for these, but would have to pay for other > ones... only have those and two 4GB IDEs, but I thought SCSI to be faster > and less CPU killing... We have enough space here, just no money for this > server :) I assumed by money he meant the cost of electricity (and your time to replace them when they go bad), since it's difficult to buy that size nowadays. The cost of two drives is about twice the cost of one drive, no matter the logical size. To me, anything under 160g is a "waste", so I guess it's subjective! =) -- Rick C. Petty