Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:05:37 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root Message-ID: <xzpznl02nry.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030602202947.GE87863@roark.gnf.org> (Gordon Tetlow's message of "Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:29:47 -0700") References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030602202947.GE87863@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:21:16PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Was /bin/sh dynamically linked? It shouldn't be. > Why shouldn't it be dynamically linked? I'd like to be able to use > ~username expansion via nss_ldap. Because forking a dynamically linked binary is slower, and /bin/sh forks a lot. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznl02nry.fsf>