Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:46:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/osf1 osf1_signal.c Message-ID: <200210010446.g914kTQJ048155@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020930162948.A50424@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020930135948.A41526@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209301404060.82116-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20020930162948.A50424@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:29:48 -0700, Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> said: > Because you want the most immediate thing, think about recieving SIGSTOP > while you have other signals queued. Except that for POSIX Real-Time Signals (those numbered between SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX) you *must* have the lowest-numbered one, regardless of when it was queued. I personally see no reason to abandon the old signal bitmaps, even with an implementation of Real-Time Signals. Please look carefully at what POSIX requires an implementation to do for RTS. (One of the Stevens books also contains a good summary.) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210010446.g914kTQJ048155>