From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 21 01:50:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF6B106566C; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from mail.standard.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7E8FC14; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unused-213.111.71.69.bilink.ua [213.111.71.69] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.standard.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q6L1godg096768; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 04:42:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) From: clutton To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 04:49:31 +0300 Message-ID: <1342835371.85868.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=9.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.isgroup.com.ua Cc: Subject: xpi infrastructure X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:50:08 -0000 Hi. Having used firefox all the time, with different profiles. I interested with ports xpi infrastructure. First, why we shouldn't move xpi-adblock/Makefile.xpi to Mk. Second, # This Makefile is a beta-version of the new xpi infrastructure. It currently # supports Gecko 1.8+ (Firefox 1.5+). Support for Gecko 1.7x (and Seamonkey 1.0) # may be merged later from Thierry Thomas works. What the status of Thierry Thomas' work? And finally, in my opinion, xpi infrastructure should die or improve. The currently state isn't good enough.