Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:30:55 +0800
From:      Martin Wilke <miwi.freebsd@googlemail.com>
To:        "glarkin@FreeBSD.org" <glarkin@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org>, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>, "miwi@FreeBSD.org" <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Python min version bumped from 2.4+ to 2.5+
Message-ID:  <6F11B9EB-86E5-4A65-90BF-256E101CC24D@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5CEC1E.5010209@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4E5CE015.70803@FreeBSD.org> <4E5CE7BB.8050808@yandex.ru> <4E5CEC1E.5010209@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In fact if  use use_python=3Dyes default is 27 we cant set python24 for remo=
val yet because we have fix first all zope stuff. Am back to the game after
Holiday

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2011, at 21:56, Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 8/30/11 9:38 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>> Greg Larkin wrote on 30.08.2011 17:05:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>=20
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>=20
>>> I have a question about a commit you made in February 2011:
>>> http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?message_id=3D201102250750.p1P7ofDg0=
16541@repoman.freebsd.org&files=3Dyes
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Part of the commit changed:
>>>=20
>>> USE_PYTHON=3D    2.4+
>>>=20
>>> to
>>>=20
>>> USE_PYTHON=3D    2.5+
>>>=20
>>> Was there a specific reason for doing so?  I am running various
>>> tinderbox builds to check on port usage of the USE_PYTHON variable, and
>>> I noticed that devel/py-setuptools no longer builds if Python 2.4 is
>>> selected.
>>>=20
>>> I'd like to restore that capability, but before I send a PR, I wanted to=

>>> check with you first.
>>>=20
>>> Thank you,
>>> Greg
>>> - --=20
>>> Greg Larkin
>>>=20
>>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/           - The Power To Serve
>>> http://www.sourcehosting.net/     - Ready. Set. Code.
>>> http://twitter.com/cpucycle/      - Follow you, follow me
>>=20
>> I'm sorry for sail in, but i think that the reason is that python24 is
>> reached it's EOL long time ago. Actually the only supported python
>> releases atm according to python.org are - 2.7.2 and 3.2.1, and
>> developers highly encourages the users to move to this versions.
>>=20
>> 2.5 and 2.6 are in security-fix-only mode, there will be no ANY releases
>> for this branches after October 2011 and October 2013 respectively,
>> while 2.4 does not get security-fixes even.
>>=20
>> There is also this answer from Martin in this pr:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/155526:
>>=20
>> python24 goes to the end of month, this port is on the todo for removal
>>=20
>=20
> Hi Ruslan,
>=20
> Ok, thank you for the explanation.  Shall I mark python24 for removal
> from the tree or file a PR for python@ to do it?
>=20
> FYI, I have been running tinderbox builds with PYTHON_VERSION and
> PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION set to python2.4, python2.5, etc. to find out if
> ports with USE_PYTHON=3Dyes need to be constrained a bit more.
>=20
> I figured that python2.4 was supported since it was still in the tree
> and wasn't marked for removal yet, but I admin that I didn't check
> python.org for confirmation.
>=20
> Regards,
> Greg
> - --=20
> Greg Larkin
>=20
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/           - The Power To Serve
> http://www.sourcehosting.net/     - Ready. Set. Code.
> http://twitter.com/cpucycle/      - Follow you, follow me
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>=20
> iEYEARECAAYFAk5c7B4ACgkQ0sRouByUApAZOQCcC0YgAzDxDj78I9u35+H53fur
> be8AmQFjWrGJ/xmjYpPp6ZkKB+ejDfq9
> =3DtK4y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6F11B9EB-86E5-4A65-90BF-256E101CC24D>