From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Dec 23 23:38:05 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA10414
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 23:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA10403
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 23:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA07566 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Sun, 24 Dec 1995 08:40:01 +0100
Message-Id: <199512240740.IAA07566@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: A Good OS for BIND? (fwd)
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org (user alias)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 1995 08:40:00 +0100 (MET)
From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Reply-To: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Picked this message up from the bind list.
Any takers to answer this?

--Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de


Forwarded message:
> From bind-users-request@vix.com Sat Dec 23 15:44:15 1995
> X-Btw: vix.com is also gw.home.vix.com and vixie.sf.ca.us
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 95 14:11:57 CST
> From: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins)
> Message-Id: <9512222011.AA24236@pegasus.ncts.navy.mil>
> To: bind-users@vix.com
> Subject: A Good OS for BIND?
> Sender: <bind-users-request@vix.com>
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins)
> 
> With the SunOS 4.1.X limitations (file descriptors and VM system)
> would one of the BSD 4.4 OS's (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/OS) be a better
> choice for running BIND?  What other OS's would be a good choice?
> 
> Mike
>