Date: 08 Apr 2002 17:08:42 -0600 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnostscript-gnu Message-ID: <1018307323.43796.2.camel@blue.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <1018305906.90601.9.camel@blue.mcneil.com> References: <1018305906.90601.9.camel@blue.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just found my problem with ghostscript-gnu. Apparantly, at some state of changes I managed to get a version that created /nonexistant. It got created as a directory and messed up the logic of extracting the jpeg port. Still unclear why the port needed to be extracted instead of using the installed headers. Sean On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 16:45, Sean McNeil wrote: > Hello, > > I am unable to compile this port as it fails looking for jpeglib.h: > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `jpeg/jpeglib.h', needed by > `obj/jpeglib0.h'. Stop. > > jpeglib.h is in /usr/local/include, not /usr/local/include/jpeg and was > installed from graphics/jpeg. It appears that it is looking for it in > the ports directory, though. > > Several packages are not being handled correctly by portupgrade in this > fashion. I'll give you some examples: > > print/ghostscript-gnu for some strange reason requires the graphics/jpeg > sources to be extracted instead of using installed includes. > > mozilla-headers and mozilla-embedded both require mozilla to be > extracted (and it appears compiled) before it will work. > > portupgrade can't really handle these cases and the first is definately > avoidable. > > These are the only major problems I see at the moment. > > Thanks for all the great work. > Sean > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1018307323.43796.2.camel>