From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Mar  7  8:19:46 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu (burdell.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.207])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7587F37B719
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2001 08:19:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dibble@cc.gatech.edu)
Received: from felix.cc.gatech.edu (felix.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.107.11])
	by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01723;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:19:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (dibble@localhost)
	by felix.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA16380;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:19:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:19:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Dibble <dibble@cc.gatech.edu>
To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
Cc: Robert <robert@chalmers.com.au>,
	stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is the BSDi CD of 4.2 STABLE or RELEASE ?
In-Reply-To: <3AA5F3D9.782606A0@quake.com.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0103071117290.16033-100000@felix.cc.gatech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Actually, Walnut Creek *does* put out a CD-ROM of -stable and, I believe,
current twice a year.  But, from the development standpoint, I would agree 
with you.  -release should be what is on the CD-ROM.

--jeff lee

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kal Torak wrote:

> Robert wrote:
> > 
> > The subject says it all?
> > 
> > bob
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 
> CDs are always RELEASE's
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 

#######################
If we weren't all crazy, we would go insane.
--Jimmy Buffett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message