Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:18:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mlockall/munlockall support? Message-ID: <200209132218.g8DMIAhE099932@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020913175930.A1762@attbi.com> References: <20020913115404.A1128@attbi.com> <20020913142801.G84338@espresso.q9media.com> <20020913175930.A1762@attbi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:59:30 -0400, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> said: > A few other questions: > - what is the status of following functions in <signal.h>: > sigqueue, sigtimedwait, sigwaitinfo The POSIX Real Time Signals option is not implemented. It may be in the future. > - is the stuff encapsulated in _P1003_1B_VISIBLE #ifdef/#endif blocks > in various header files like <limits.h> <time.h> <sys/signal.h> > <sys/unistd.h> still applicable? If it still uses that symbol, it means nobody has looked at it for long enough to determine definitively. In some cases it is probably used erroneously. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209132218.g8DMIAhE099932>