From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun  6 14:46:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24A937B568
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Jun 2000 14:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e56LkXf06457;
	Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:46:32 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Chris Wasser <cwasser@v-wave.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Multiple LPT Ports: Second Posting
Message-ID: <20000606144632.S17973@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <SAK.2000.06.06.ocsfgcdh@area51>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <SAK.2000.06.06.ocsfgcdh@area51>; from cwasser@v-wave.com on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 03:18:10PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Chris Wasser <cwasser@v-wave.com> [000606 14:18] wrote:
> Nah, no irq misassignment in my boxes. I always make sure each device has 
> it's own IRQ that isn't shared (save for this LPT issue) so that's not 
> it. I'll include a dmesg for thoroughness (no verbose output tho, just 
> standard dmesg)

I didn't mean conflict, I meant misconfiguration, as in you may have
the ports at IO x firing on 5 and the one at IO y firing on 7 but in
reality it's the oppsite.  This may not be the case, but it's possible.

You may also have more luck playing with lpt flags and BIOS settings
for the ports.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message