From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 24 23:41:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1EA37B49D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020625064012.JTKX26243.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:40:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA56343; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:37:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native PPPoE broken (4.6-STABLE), RP-PPPoE working?! In-Reply-To: <2trfhu0tbekq67seicn4amdovp7564ji62@4ax.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >It seems hard to understand how the pppoe node in the kernel can slow > >things down. > > Here is an example > I wasn;t saying there was a problem, just that my imagination is having a hard time coming up with an explanation.. I know that the answer has to be in tcpdump traces.. you can tcpdump on both the tun interface or the ethernet interface.. it may be worth doing both to see if there is any delay between the two.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message