Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:47:11 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: from very early this morning... Message-ID: <49E582EF.8040606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1239774457.5886.15.camel@ethos.thought.org> References: <20090414224141.GA16354@thought.org> <49E51AD7.4060600@ibctech.ca> <eaba3b490904141910v2e8cfd1as5cb20328edab39a0@mail.gmail.com> <1239774457.5886.15.camel@ethos.thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> (But if a dual or a quad sucks up too > many watts, that blows much of the original purpose of cutting my > footprint. > Newer cpu's(multicore vs single) are pretty efficient, here's an article so you don't have to take my word for it. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-cpu-power-consumption,1750-11.html also in general if you want lower power consumption look for cpu's w/ smaller fab eg in term of power consumption and size 90 > 65 > 45 > gary > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E582EF.8040606>