From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 00:53:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD1016A4B3 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF72C43FE9 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:53:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 1123 invoked by uid 65534); 24 Sep 2003 07:53:24 -0000 Received: from pD9E2DD0A.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO gmx.net) (217.226.221.10) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 09:53:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #17236065 Message-ID: <3F714D90.6010002@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:53:52 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030911 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: deischen@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Freebsd Current Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:53:33 -0000 Daniel Eischen wrote: > Making -pthread a NOOP _would_ (*) break the application > in the link stage; it would be obvious when the application > failed to link with lots of unresolved pthread symbols. Yeah it would break. It would break in a way where the first thing I would suppose to be the case would be a problem with the compiler install instead of what it's supposed to tell me. I still stay by this: This is silly and annoying for someone not esp. interrested in all those wars about which thread lib is better then the other.