Date: 14 Apr 2003 12:06:11 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netatalk Message-ID: <1050336371.371.23.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1627DF8C-6E90-11D7-9DA6-000393496BE8@lassitu.de> References: <1627DF8C-6E90-11D7-9DA6-000393496BE8@lassitu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-UHPTsU6Z+2IQFGTDT0ax Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 11:45, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am Montag, 14.04.03, um 15:46 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb John Hoder: >=20 > > i'm running freebsd 4.7 at home and have been nothing but delighted > > by its performance. i noticed some posts you had written about > > netatalk for fbsd, patches, etc. i have no experience with cvs. i > > was wondering if you could point me to the appropriate programs i > > need to run netatalk and network my macs. > > > > fyi, i loaded a generic unix version of netatalk and i did: > > > > 1. configure my kernel to include "options NETATALK" > > 2. checked for dependencies (installed db3) > > 3. tried pointing the ./configure script at the berkeley db but I > > still get.. > > > > "berkeley db cannot be found" error message. >=20 > Good to hear you like it, but it's been quite some time since I was=20 > involved in netatalk in any way... >=20 > Are you trying to build netatalk manually? The ports builds just fine=20 > for me. >=20 > If you have a complete set of 4.7 CDs, you should be able to install=20 > the package using /stand/sysinstall, or install the ports collection,=20 > and run "cd /usr/ports/net/netatalk && make install && make clean". >=20 > If you want to run the latest and greatest version from ports, you can=20 > update your ports collection with cvsup, which is explained in the=20 > Handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html >=20 > If you have specific trouble with the net/netatalk port, you should get=20 > in touch with it's maintainer (the MAINTAINER=3D line in the port's=20 > Makefile), or ask on freebsd-ports@freebsd.org. Yeah, there are some funky things that need to be done to get Netatalk to build on FreeBSD. That's why you should use the port. The latest port is in sync with the latest version of Netatalk, 1.6.2. Joe >=20 > HTH, > Stefan --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-UHPTsU6Z+2IQFGTDT0ax Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+mtxzb2iPiv4Uz4cRAhySAJ0ctzRSqT/JlJj9Q24wy5VHG7DKggCcCLLs Zb9kCQLkOC3nDmCNIsspGfQ= =3gFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UHPTsU6Z+2IQFGTDT0ax--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050336371.371.23.camel>