From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 06:39:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ABE16A422; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <43646AAC.2080107@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:39:40 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050806 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <30595.1130493297@critter.freebsd.dk> <20051028153457.d0wqgn2ask4sgw4k@netchild.homeip.net> <20051029195703.GB39253@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20051029195703.GB39253@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:39:37 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: >On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 03:34:57PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > >>I don't have the message at hand. I just had time to write the mail, but I >>don't have my laptop with me to reproduce the message. But it's easy to >>reproduce, just take a PC which is able to make use of powerd and switch to >>using TSC as the timecounter. >> >> > >What is the motivation to use the TSC as a timecounter? > > > TSC is faster than any others, on many systems, so-called ACPI-fast timer is really a slow chip, at least far slower than reading from RAM, manufactories just lie on this. Regards, David Xu