From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 5 16:22:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA23921 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 16:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA23914 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 16:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id SAA18512; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:22:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA01875; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 21:42:03 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 21:42:02 -0600 (CST) From: "Jay D. Nelson" To: Cliff Addy cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: newer pine? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Don't know what the latest is, but 3.95 was the last I found. I used the 'build neb' option (NetBSD) and it worked fine -- under 2.1.6 and 2.2. -- Jay On Fri, 21 Feb 1997, Cliff Addy wrote: ->I was very disappointed to see that the 2.1.6 cd did not have a port of ->the latest pine. We have a constant problem with the current port when ->the user loses their connection, the process runs wild, eating 80% of the ->cpu time. -> ->Supposedly this is a known bug that is fixed in the latest pine. I tried ->compiling the source, but there is no direct support of fbsd and I could ->not get it working. -> ->Will the newer version be ported soon? Barring that, does anyone know ->what needs to be hacked to get a good compile on the newer code? ->