From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 18 19:46:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28329 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 19:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.intercenter.net (mir.intercenter.net [207.211.128.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA28317 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 19:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 26583 invoked from network); 19 Feb 1997 03:46:43 -0000 Received: from ct1-02.intercenter.net (HELO oz.intercenter.net) (207.211.129.35) by mir.intercenter.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 1997 03:46:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 22:46:11 -0500 (EST) From: Ron Bickers Reply-To: Ron Bickers To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Servers (single IP) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The long and the short of this is: why should I give an ISP money who > insists on dictating to me? HTTP 1.1 is great -- I'd like to see it become > standard -- but it's not. At this point you have a choice, someday you *may* not. > As an aside, I am using lynx much more, because so many ignorant web > designers want animated icons and enough gewgaw bulls**t on their pages > that I can't get to the real information because of the distraction. I > don't waste my time with those who don't deliver what I need and want. That's a whole 'nother issue but without condoning Jay's filthy language :-), I fully concur. Some sites are just out of control. > If you, as Internet __Service__ Providers choose to ignore me -- and many > like me, you will lose the business to those who are willing to provide > the service for which we are willing to pay. And well they should lose the business. The customer deserves the best, though someday the best may be the kludge HTTP 1.1 offers. We'll see..