Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:32:37 -0500
From:      Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?
Message-ID:  <c5fc2cb8-faa6-ffe5-887a-dc07b242f694@denninger.net>
In-Reply-To: <op.yk51o9vtkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
References:  <a3ad16f6-3bae-68dd-d4c7-9ed7cd223aa5@denninger.net> <op.yk51o9vtkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
> <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
>
>> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
>> high-performance alternatives to sendmail....
>>
>> Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
>> Postfix appears to be ignoring it, which implies that it is not paying
>> attention to the hosts.allow file (and the wrapper that enables it.)
>>
>> Recently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled
>> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need)
>> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban them, postfix
>> is ignoring the entries it makes which implies it is not linked with the
>> tcp wrappers.
>>
>> A quick look at the config for postfix doesn't disclose an obvious
>> configuration solution....did I miss it?
>>
>
> Don't know if postfix can handle tcp wrappers, but I use bruteblock
> [1] for protecting connections via the ipfw firewall. I use this for
> ssh and postfix.
>
I recompiled sshguard to use ipfw and stuck the table lookup in my
firewall config..... works, and is software-agnostic (thus doesn't care
if something was linked against tcpwrappers or not.)

-- 
Karl Denninger
karl@denninger.net <mailto:karl@denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/

[-- Attachment #2 --]
0	*H
010
	`He0	*H
_0[0C)0
	*H
010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1"0 	*H
	Cuda Systems LLC CA0
150421022159Z
200419022159Z0Z10	UUS10UFlorida10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UKarl Denninger (OCSP)0"0
	*H
0
X@vkY
Tq/vE]5#֯MX\8LJ/V?5Da+
sJc*/r{ȼnS+w")ąZ^DtdCOZ ~7Q '@a#ijc۴oZdB&!Ӝ-<	?HN5y
5}F|ef゘"Vلio74zn">a1qWuɖbFeGE&3(KhixG3!#e_XƬϜ/,$+;4y'Bz<qT9_?rRUpn5
Jn&Rx/p Jyel*pN8/#9u/YPEC)TY>~/˘N[vyiDKˉ,^" ?$T8v&K%z8C @?K{9f`+@,|Mbia007++0)0'+0http://cudasystems.net:88880	U00	`HB0U0,	`HB
OpenSSL Generated Certificate0U-h\Ff Y0U#0$q}ݽʒm50U0karl@denninger.net0
	*H
Owbabɺx&Uk[(Oj!%pMQ0I!#QH}.>~2&D}<wm_>V6v]f>=Nn+8;q wfΰ/RLyUG#b}n!Dր_up|_ǰc/%ۥ
nN8:d;-UJd/m1~VނיnN I˾$tF1&}|?q?\đXԑ&\4V<lKۮ3%Am_(q-(cAeGX)f}-˥6cv~Kg8m~v;|9:-iAPқ6ېn-.)<[$KJtt/L4ᖣ^Cmu4vb{+BG$M0c\[MR|0FԸP&78"4p#}DZ9;V9#>Sw"[UP7100010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1"0 	*H
	Cuda Systems LLC CA)0
	`HeM0	*H
	1	*H
0	*H
	1
160725173237Z0O	*H
	1B@?T8tPJy?OϞGؤ\BO@yXi*}AVcOƒ0l	*H
	1_0]0	`He*0	`He0
*H
0*H
0
*H
@0+0
*H
(0	+710010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1"0 	*H
	Cuda Systems LLC CA)0*H
	1010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1"0 	*H
	Cuda Systems LLC CA)0
	*H
420&_V&WzCk䦛Q:Vg3eXkl&9u?!_w.sz>`+TQh%ߧq˦{;‡*^]pSAWVvlɸm76˰c3Vo
Rm<gJՓЊ3
궣AfViD+.rT4~mXI,:96@E(J /aB˿(<oS˭qZ/=9l{LXVr\?V:U6i	OhuU0⽹tf?-5"-1q5"0.	RzTLX9`L3mVȿ=K}0ƛ3d
L?`xߊ*;఻ş6k=,3`Sק8jss+3CZ97w9ŌřwǁLjyqf;S

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c5fc2cb8-faa6-ffe5-887a-dc07b242f694>