Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:50:31 +1100
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
Message-ID:  <20130401055031.GB47589@eureka.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday,  1 April 2013 at  0:48:08 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 architecture in FreeBSD.
>
> Computers are getting faster, but also more memory intensive.  I
> can not find a laptop with less than 4 or 8 GB of RAM.  Modern
> browsers, such as Firefox, require a 64bit architecture and 8GB of
> RAM.  A 32 bit platform is not enough now a days on systems with
> more than 4 GB of RAM.  A 32 bit core now is like 640K of RAM in
> the 1990s.  Even in the embedded world ARM is going 64 bit with
> ARMv8.
>
> Secondly, the i386 port is unmaintained.  Very few developers run
> it, so it doesn't get the testing it deserves.  Almost every user
> post or bug report I see from a x86 compatible processor is running
> amd64.  When was the last time you booted i386 outside a virtual
> machine?  Often times the build works for amd64 but fails for i386.
>
> Finally, others are dropping support for i386.  Windows Server 2008
> is 64 bit only, OSX Mountain Lion (10.8) is 64-bit only.   Users
> and downstream vendors no longer care about preserving ancient
> hardware.
>
> I hope this email is enough to convince you that on this date we
> should drop support for the i386 architecture for 10.0 to tier 2
> and replace it with the ARM architecture as Tier 1.

Nice one!  And only 48 minutes into the day.  I've seen a number of
people take it seriously.

Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed.  If your Microsoft MUA reports
problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua

--3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlFZICYACgkQIubykFB6QiPo5QCfbZklgxo/h4moVfwrzlmCDj3N
yVwAnA2RsSCOqjI9Ot2NP8C9tdDfAKLd
=eMP3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130401055031.GB47589>