From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 13 09:58:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5672106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6F88FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6D9wOU2023700;
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:25 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q6D9wOEm023697; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FFF3386.1060109@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207131157440.23696@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CAPj0R5KJ=0yFcQG5azYfCS73oWLAfJhf4NpAz5Oozo4N-vYQyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121940400.2744@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAPj0R5KsUdM6LsrtvDzSVBScO9k-TFoa=D6O6ghsch0Y-iNx+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org>
	<4FFF3386.1060109@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:25 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, kpneal@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:58:30 -0000

> We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need for the 
> severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the sites accessible 
> meaning that we need to request access if we need to go somewhere not 
> governed by that proxy.
this make sense.

just blocking everything except 80 is pure nonsense.