From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 10 05:41:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D13716A41F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:41:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE53C43D46
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:41:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 78068 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2005 05:41:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 10 Sep 2005 05:41:01 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:40:59 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: babkin@users.sf.net
In-Reply-To: <8656351.1126268001929.JavaMail.root@vms064.mailsrvcs.net>
Message-ID: <20050910003845.F46535@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <8656351.1126268001929.JavaMail.root@vms064.mailsrvcs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Kamal R. Prasad" <kamalpr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: JFS2 on freebsd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:41:03 -0000


On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Sergey Babkin wrote:

>> OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would
>> be something of use to many people, I suspect.
>
> Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has
> journaling in it.
>
> -SB

I was thinking that as I wrote it as well, I'm not sure why I didn't state 
it.  But before ext3's journalling extensions could be implemented, ext2 
would have to be brought up to date.  Also, it would be nice if ext2 could 
be reimplemented in BSD licensed code before undergoing that ext3 
conversion. :)

Mike "Silby" Silbersack