From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 13:56:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89149106566B for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2388E8FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.23] (helo=13.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #88) id 1Lwcw8-0007r0-2D for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:28 +0200 Received: from tb821.t.pppool.de ([89.55.184.33]:30960 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 13.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #79) id 1Lwcw7-0008OF-Ql for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:28 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:27 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090422155627.7b6e127d@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: References: <49EE49D8.7000902@free.de> <20090422123020.42b756c1@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.2-RC1 - ZFS related kernel panic "kmem_map too small" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:56:29 -0000 On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:16:06 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On my 8-current amd64 machine with only 4GB of RAM I see larger values > > than you see with 16GB: > > > > sysctl vm.kmem_size_max > > vm.kmem_size_max: 4509713203 > > sysctl vm.kmem_size > > vm.kmem_size: 1335824384 > > Ok, but remember that ZFS in -CURRENT is very different from ZFS in -STABLE. > True, but the kmem_size stuff has nothing to do with ZFS. It's VM. --- Gary Jennejohn