Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:49:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262830] devel/jna: request: upgrade openjdk11 or add FLAVOR=openjdk11 Message-ID: <bug-262830-7788-JzlzjJsX66@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-262830-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-262830-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262830 Ronald Klop <ronald@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ronald@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Ronald Klop <ronald@FreeBSD.org> --- Is the point of this issue that openjdk8 should only be a BUILD_DEPENDS and= not a RUN_DEPENDS of devel/jna? I solved something similar in archivers/snappy-java in commit ports 10316ebec744a6bcaf285f0df5a354136b4771ee . JAVA_BUILD=3D jre # prevent JAVA_RUN via bsd.java.mk Would that solve the issue here too? I can imagine that JNA does not work as standalone port. It will always be included in some other ports which provi= des the RUN_DEPENDS. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-262830-7788-JzlzjJsX66>