From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 30 12:55:06 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA67A54;
 Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi
 [195.197.172.111])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05F73E6;
 Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:55:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jh (a91-153-115-208.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.153.115.208])
 by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 0279D21658B;
 Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:45:22 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:45:22 +0200
From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: big change to devfs rules path matching
Message-ID: <20130330120724.GB32407@jh>
References: <5150B598.7050700@FreeBSD.org> <5150B71B.6060106@FreeBSD.org>
 <5154012A.4010602@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5154012A.4010602@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:55:06 -0000

On 2013-03-28, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > Would like to ask for opinions on this topic...
> > Please read this PR for context:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/122838
> > Especially Jaakko's insightful description of the problem.
> 
> So I would like to commit the following patch sooner rather than later:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/devfs_rule.diff
> The only difference from the Jaakko's patch in the PR is FNM_PATHNAME.
> 
> Please review and test.

Good to see this moving forward!

Maybe the change warrants an UPDATING entry?

-- 
Jaakko